FinCEN CDD BO FAQ 2 - 28 – What types of entities would be considered a “non-U.S. governmental department, agency or political subdivision that engages only in governmental rather than commercial activities?”

Compliance > BSA > FinCEN CDD/BO Rule - eff 2016
Q:  What types of entities would be considered a “non-U.S. governmental department, agency or political subdivision that engages only in governmental rather than commercial activities” such that they would qualify for exclusion from the definition of a legal entity customer?
 
A:  Examples of legal entity customers that would be considered non-U.S. governmental entities engaged in only governmental and not commercial activities include entities that are owned and operated by a non-U.S. government agency or political subdivision, such as embassies or consulates, as well as entities that are instrumentalities of a foreign government, such as government-owned enterprises engaging in activities that are exclusively governmental in nature, that is, activities involving the direct exercise of legislative, executive, or judicial authority and which do not involve taking profits from the endeavor.  Those State-owned enterprises engaged in profit-seeking activities, including, among others, sovereign wealth funds, airlines, or oil companies, would not qualify for the legal entity customer exclusion.  Generally, many State-owned enterprises may not have an individual that owns at least a 25 percent equity interest because a governmental department, agency, or political subdivision holds such interest.
 
In these circumstances, a covered financial institution would only be required to identify an individual under the control prong.  Similarly, with respect to a State-owned enterprise that is a pooled investment vehicle not subject to another exclusion, financial institutions would be required to obtain beneficial ownership information under the control prong but not under the ownership/equity prong of the definition of beneficial owner. 
 
Furthermore, similar to other instances of identification and verification within the Rule’s context, a covered financial institution may reasonably rely upon the representations of the legal entity customer, absent knowledge of facts that would call into question the reliability of the beneficial ownership information provided to the financial institution.
 
 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
The above FAQ was included in FinCEN’s 2nd set of CDD FAQs that were released in April 2018.  The FAQs are provided to assist financial institution in understanding the scope of the customer due diligence / beneficial ownership rule.  The 2018 FAQs may be found here:
 

Add Feedback