2018 Appraisal FAQ 6 – What cost-effective actions can a smaller financial institution take to implement an appraisal and evaluation review program …?

Compliance > Lending > Appraisal Regulations & Interagency Stmt.
Q:  What cost-effective actions can a smaller financial institution take to implement an appraisal and evaluation review program that meets the standards for independence in the agencies’ appraisal regulations?
 
A:   A small financial institution with limited staff should implement practical safeguards for reviewing appraisals and evaluations when absolute lines of separation between the collateral valuation program and loan production process cannot be achieved.23  Small financial institutions could have loan officers, other employees, or directors review an appraisal or evaluation, but those individuals should be appropriately qualified, independent of the transaction, and should abstain from any vote or approval related to such loans.  
 
To the extent that a financial institution is involved in real estate transactions that are complex, out of market, or otherwise exhibit elevated risk, management should assess the level of in-house expertise available to review appraisals or evaluations associated with these types of transactions.  If the expertise is not available in-house, the financial institution may find it appropriate to evaluate alternatives, such as outsourcing of the review process, for ensuring that effective and independent reviews are performed.   
 
For transactions subject to the IFR on Valuation Independence, institutions must comply with the provisions of that rule.24
 
23 Id.  
24 See, e.g., Board: 12 CFR 226.42(d) and BCFP: 12 CFR 1026.42(d).
 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
This can be found in the 2018 “Frequently Asked Questions on Appraisal Regulations and the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines,” which may be found here:
https://www2.occ.gov/news-issuances/bulletins/2018/bulletin-2018-39a.pdf
 

Add Feedback